Hello, maybe you can reproduce the same situation using tcp and grab a network trace (ngrep with at least -t) for such a call to see what woould be the difference of time between those packets. Maybe the transaction is already destroyed.
Cheers, Daniel On 09/10/15 16:22, John Billings wrote: >> Hello, >> >> look at: >> >> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.p.cancel_b_method >> >> Maybe one or another value for that parameter is suiting better your use >> case. > Thank you for the suggestion. > > This looked promising, but the cancel_b_method parameter is already at the > default value of one. I also tried changing the value to two and got a > similar result. > > This may sound crazy, but it almost seems like the problem happens only when > kamailio is processing unrelated INVITES at the same time. > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
