Hello, On 15/07/15 22:22, Andrey Utkin wrote: > 2015-07-15 21:59 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>: >> As far as I know, t_on_branch() should execute for every branch, including >> the first one. Do you have any other evidence that it doesn't, i.e. a simple >> xlog statement? > I am unable to test this now in my local environment, but I believe we > have tested this few days ago, and that was the reason why I added > record_route_advertised_address() also after lookup(). > I haven't looked into kamailio sources about this yet. > If you are sure that t_on_branch route is supposed to be executed on > each branch, then I should retest it and let you know the results. > > There's new RR-related issue: now tested it in different setup, and > record_route_advertised_address() doesn't write "transport=" attribute > when the call goes from websocket to TLS. So Linphone sends BYE via > UDP again. > if you run Kamailio behind NAT and want to advertise a different (public) IP address in SIP headers, then it is recommended to use:
listen=privateip advertise publicip See: http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.3.x/core#listen Then you simply keep using record_route() (no need for manual address specification via record route preset or advertised address variants). Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
