Alex Balashov writes: > Oh, I see. I would agree with your interpretation of the documentation, > but that would render such a feature rather useless, since, as you point > out, this does not expose branch-level control. So, I'm wondering if the > documentation is perhaps unclear about what it really does.
As I mentioned in the previous message, my test shows that README is correct in that via-branch values 1 and 2 refer to incoming via headers. That is why there exists the extra value, which allows taking via-branch value from "extra_id_pv" variable. The question has been, what value could I assign to extra_id_pv to uniquely identify the branch. Since $T_branch_idx exists, perhaps a good choice could be $sel(via[1].branch) + $T_branch_idx. -- Juha _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
