On 13/03/15 16:39, Markus wrote: > [...] > > >> I think this is something specific for your environment. Kamailio >> doesn't have any issues sending redirect replies. A proxy might be >> required in case of natted endpoints when they cannot communicate each >> other. But otherwise, if you don't want the new INVITE to pass again via >> LB, then you can send 3xx. > > Other than communication between natted endpoints you don't see any > disadvantage of using Kamailio for LB+HA as Redirect server instead as > proxy server? >From Kamailio point of view, there is nothing. When doing redirect, the accounting for new calls (resulted from redirect) is no longer possible on the sip server, but I guess that is not something you look for in this scenario.
Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
