Do you have record_route() in your code? Where is it relative to the
ims_charging function?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17/03/15 20:58, Shane Harrison wrote:
> Thanks Daniel,
>
> From the request_route block I call the ims_charging module function
> Ro_CCR(). This is non-blocking and one of the parameters in the call is the
> route block to be called ( e.g. CHARGING_CCR_REPLY ) when the response to the
> charging request is obtained. Looking at the code, the Ro_CCR() function
> does a t_suspend() and then the ims_charging module does a t_continue() when
> the response is received. Then the specified routing block is called and
> processing of the INVITE continues.
>
> route[CHARGING_CCR_REPLY] {
> xlog("L_DBG","cca_return code is $avp(s:cca_return_code)\n");
> switch ($avp(s:cca_return_code)) {
> case 1: #success
> route(LOCATION);
> route(RELAY);
> break;
> .....
> }
>
> It appears that the RR parameter that is added during the request_route
> processing (via dialog tracking) is no longer there when the INVITE continues
> being processed in the CHARGING_CCR_REPLY route block. Is that what you
> would expect? Any pointers to solutions?
>
> Hope that answers your question.
>
> Cheers
> Shane
> ________________________________________
> From: sr-users [sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mico...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 18 March 2015 00:24
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE
>
> In what callback do you need it?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 3/17/15, Shane Harrison <shane.harri...@imgtec.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Daniel. Yes I am using the ims_charging module hence the need for
>> the dialoguing module.
>>
>> I have confirmed that the dialog_id (DID) is added if I t_relay() the INVITE
>> in the request_route. Hence dialog_ng is adding the parameter to the
>> record_route when it creates a new_dialog. It is however lost once I exit
>> from request_route.
>>
>> How do I ensure the RR parameter gets added when I resume processing the
>> INVITE in the callback route block?
>>
>> Cheers and thanks
>> Shane
>> ________________________________________
>> From: sr-users [sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mico...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 17 March 2015 19:34
>> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> dialog_ng is more or less tailored for IMS modules, dialog module is
>> still in use and very actual.
>>
>> If you are not using IMS module, you should try the dialog module. I
>> haven't seen any issues for it lately and if there are, they will get
>> fixed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 17/03/15 03:28, Shane Harrison wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Have found a few threads on this before which have clarified my
>>> understanding a little but not yet presented me with a solution.
>>>
>>> I am using dialog_ng. dlg_manage() is deprecated and as per the
>>> documentation, I am simply setting a dialog flag early in the
>>> request_route.
>>>
>>> Kamctl dialog show does indeed show the dialogs are tracked, but they are
>>> not destroyed on the receipt of the BYE. Dialog ref count remains at 2
>>> and in state=4
>>>
>>> Log shows the following
>>>
>>> Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=16 , global msg
>>> id=15 , T on entrance=(nil)
>>> Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching:
>>> hash=5943, isACK=0
>>> Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching
>>> failed
>>> Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no
>>> transaction found
>>> Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm
>>> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG:
>>> trans=0x7fc8d79af798, callback type 1, id 0 entered
>>> Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG:
>>> dialog_ng [dlg_handlers.c:855]: dlg_new_dialog(): starting dlg_new_dialog
>>> and method is [BYE]
>>>
>>> Looks to me as if fails to find a dialog match and actually creates a new
>>> dialog.....
>>>
>>> Dialog_ng only has one matching mode - DID, others have been deprecated.
>>> I have captured the outgoing INVITE and there is no dialog_id parameter
>>> added to the record_route. Is that causing my matching problem?
>>> Record-Route:
>>> <sip:64.208.160.211;transport=tcp;lr=on;ftag=5419eecb;nat=yes>
>>> Record-Route: <sip:203.171.39.49:5061;transport=tls;lr=on>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Shane
>>>
>>>
>>> Shane Harrison
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>
>>> Imagination Technologies NZ Limited
>>> Level 2
>>> 1 Market Grove
>>> Lower Hutt, 5010
>>> New Zealand
>>>
>>> PO Box 30-449
>>> Lower Hutt, 5040
>>> New Zealand
>>>
>>> Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
>> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/micond<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
