On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:35:54 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > On 24/02/15 00:05, Anthony Messina wrote: > > On Monday, February 23, 2015 09:53:08 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> trusted does string comparison for the address field, it is not > >> considered an ip address. > >> > >> You should use address table instead if you just need matching on any ip > >> address or subnet. > > > > That's interesting. Is there a reason for the string comparison? Reading > > the README, trusted and address functions look incredibly similar, > > except trusted can match proto, and the address commands can match > > ports. What would be the advantage or use case of using either trusted > > or address? > > I am not the developer of that function and haven't used it for a while. > IIRC, it was added like 2003-2004 and kept being so. I use address table > as it has more features in matching subnets and does pre-compilation of > ip addresses, thus is fast. > > If someone provides a patch for doing ip-based comparison for trusted > table, it will be accepted. The C helper functions are available, so the > patch should not be big (ipops module can be used as example of C code > for comparing ip addresses). > Cheers, > Daniel
Understood. I am using the address table as well for that very reason. I just didn't know if it was an *intentional* difference. Thanks. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
