This is what I testet:
route[ROUTE_EXECUTE_CF_LOOP_NR]
{
xlog("L_NOTICE", "ROUTE_EXECUTE_CF_LOOP_NR");
if(!t_is_failure_route())
{
record_route();
}
$var(count_dlg) = 0;
route(ROUTE_SET_CALLER_DIALOG);
$du = "sip:192.168.20.100:5060";
xlog("L_INFO", "Trigger CF loop NR to '$du' for call to '$ru' - [% logreq
-%]\n");
t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE_HUNT");
t_on_branch("BRANCH_ROUTE_FWD_LOOP");
}
while(is_avp_set("$(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0])"))
{
$ru = $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]);
$var(new_ruri) = $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]);
$(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]) = $null;
xlog("L_NOTICE", "1 DST: $ru");
append_branch($avp(new_ruri));
route(ROUTE_EXECUTE_CF_LOOP_NR);
}
t_relay_to("0x01");
exit;
With $avp(s:cf_destinations)[0] = "5...@dom1.com" and
$avp(s:cf_destinations)[1] = "6...@dom1.com", what I get on the logs is ...
[...]
1 DST: sip:5...@dom1.com
1 DST: sip:6...@dom1.com
Appending P-D-URI 'sip:192.168.20.100:5060' - R=sip:6...@dom1.com
ID=54d8f17fbb4a-m5l3n9j3xd73
Appending P-D-URI 'sip:192.168.20.100:5060' - R=sip:6...@dom1.com
ID=54d8f17fbb4a-m5l3n9j3xd73
[...]
Meaning (from my ignorance), that the last $ru it's used for both
'appended_branches', no matter what I pass to append_branch
When I expected:
[...]
1 DST: sip:5...@dom1.com
1 DST: sip:6...@dom1.com
Appending P-D-URI 'sip:192.168.20.100:5060' - R=sip:5...@dom1.com
ID=54d8f17fbb4a-m5l3n9j3xd73.1
Appending P-D-URI 'sip:192.168.20.100:5060' - R=sip:6...@dom1.com
ID=54d8f17fbb4a-m5l3n9j3xd73.2
[...]
Are there any example of parallel forking, that works like this? ... I'm doing
something terrible wrong?
Best regards
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
