On lun, 2015-02-02 at 17:54 +0000, Charles Chance wrote: > Hi, > > > Can you send the output of "kamcmd dmq.list_nodes" (mask IP addresses > if needed)?
proxy2:/etc/kamailio# kamcmd dmq.list_nodes
{
host: 10.0.0.3
port: 5060
resolved_ip: 10.0.0.3
status: 2
last_notification: 0
local: 0
}
{
host: 10.0.0.1
port: 5060
resolved_ip: 10.0.0.1
status: 2
last_notification: 0
local: 0
}
{
host: dmq.my.domain.net
port:
resolved_ip: 0.0.0.0
status: 2
last_notification: 0
local: 0
}
{
host: 10.0.0.2
port: 5060
resolved_ip: 10.0.0.2
status: 8
last_notification: 0
local: 1
}
dmq.my.domain.net resolves to 10.0.0.2 which is proxy2. What I'm
effectively trying to do with DNS is to avoid having a static entry in
configuration file as notification address. I'd like to build a dynamic
list of notification servers via SRV records and have DMQ honor the
priority and weight of such list.
>
>
> I will try to replicate your scenario and come back with a solution
> shortly.
>
>
> By the way, your dmq "notification_address" parameter looks slightly
> odd (although I don't know what you're doing with DNS) - it should
> simply point to one other node in the cluster, so that on startup it
> can request information about any other nodes from this one. Also, in
> the block which calls dmq_handle_message(), you should exit straight
> away after.
Fixed.
>
>
> One final note, you should really listen on a separate port for dmq
> purposes (e.g. 5080) and restrict access to it at firewall level. You
> can then check in config that the message was received on this port,
> like:
>
>
> if (method == "KDMQ" && $Rp == 5080) {
> dmq_handle_message();
> exit;
> }
Tnx, I will do that. Now I'm just running in a lab.
Thanks!
- leonardo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
