Found similar question in archives - so workarounded with $ru modification. Thank you!
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Dmytro Bogovych <dmytro.bogov...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I found problem. > The resumed INVITE transaction was sent to LOCATION route instead of RELAY. > > However I see another problem now - t_relay() attempts to send resumed > transaction to bad destination address. > > Jan 2 13:41:37 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[18186]: ERROR: tm > [../../forward.h:227]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed > Jan 2 13:41:37 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[18186]: ERROR: tm > [t_fwd.c:1608]: t_send_branch(): ERROR: t_send_branch: sending request > on branch 0 failed > Jan 2 13:41:37 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[18186]: ERROR: sl > [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: > Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) > > I tried to workaround it with t_relay_to_udp/tcp/tls(ip, port) > However kamailio reports > function t_relay_to_udp: parameter 1 is not constant > > The problem line is: > if (!t_relay_to_udp($var(rr_ip), $var(rr_port))) sl_reply_error(); > > Does it mean t_relay_to_udp() accepts only constant values? > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Dmytro Bogovych > <dmytro.bogov...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Greetings. >> I'm trying to adopt kamailio to handle incoming calls / generate push >> notifications for softphone running on Windows Phone 8. >> Starting point was this publication >> http://www.kamailio.org/events/2014-KamailioWorld/day2/26-Daniel-Constantin.Mierla-Kamailio.cfg-Async.pdf >> >> I adopted the script from publication a bit - now notification URI is >> extracted from REGISTER messages + INVITE transactions are not >> resuming when unregistering happens. >> >> However it does not work for me yet. >> I see the suspicious output in kamailio log when softphone registers >> after incoming push notification. >> Please ignore ERROR: level name - it is just dirty logging call, not >> real problem. >> >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: ERROR: >> <script>: resuming trasaction [40951:63820139] dbogovych >> (40951:63820139) >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1635]: t_lookup_ident(): DEBUG: t_lookup_ident: >> transaction found >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG: >> registrar [lookup.c:181]: lookup(): contact for [dbogovych] found by >> address >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG: >> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 90211984 >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG: >> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 91061218 >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG: >> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 91229062 >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG: >> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 90750343 >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG: >> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 87612750 >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: DEBUG: >> registrar [lookup.c:327]: lookup(): instance is 91841578 >> Dec 17 14:20:11 voipobjects /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[29652]: WARNING: >> tm [t_lookup.c:1537]: t_unref(): WARNING: script writer didn't release >> transaction >> >> Can this "script writer didn't release transaction" be the problem? >> >> Thank you :) _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
