Hello, having more record-route addresses in the same header, separated by comma, it is valid. Other headers (Via, Record-Route, Supported, Required ...) can have same format, it is a matter of UAC how it builds them, each with a header name or all under same header name.
Cheers, Daniel On 04/12/14 12:24, Ben Langfeld wrote: > I'm facing a problem which I believe may be a bug in the registrar > module's lookup. When a registration comes with multiple Path headers, > these are recorded in the location table as comma separated. When the > lookup is performed and these are used to construct the Route > header(s) on an INVITE, this comma-separated list is not split into > multiple Route headers, but instead included verbatim in a single header. > > Here comes my theory for how this breaks my scenario: > > When the INVITE then reaches the first hop (first Path header, also > Kamailio), relay() sees that the Route header is itself and/or sees > that there is only one Route header. > > The observed result is that the first hop then sends the INVITE > directly to the Contact, instead of via the second hop. > > An example of the situation I'm facing is shown > in https://gist.github.com/benlangfeld/b374a0ce0bdb6bdc35e7. > > Is there a particular reason the combined path is not split on lookup? > Is this a bug / oversight? Am I crazy? > > Thanks! > Ben > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
