Hi All

I'm scratching my head on this one, I have set everything up in the following 
configuration:

Public ip natted to DMZ via Cisco ASA 5510  <= DMZ => Kamailio & RTP Proxy <= 
Voice DMZ => Asterisk

My kamailio configuration is based heavily on the one found here: 
http://saevolgo.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/rtpproxy-revisited-kamailio-40.html  & 
http://saevolgo.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/how-to-increasing-voip-services.html

So far everything is working fine, I can register via the public IP address, IM 
& presence is working, and as does audio, however when I dial an extension the 
caller id comes up like this 
12345@172.16.15.123:5080<mailto:12345@172.16.15.123:5080> which is the ip 
addresses of the asterisk server that the dispatcher has assigned to the call, 
I have tried setting the P-Asserted-Identity, P-Preferred-Identity & 
Remote-Party-ID headers to no effect.  What I would like to achieve is that the 
public IP or domain name comes up when I call an extension.  From examining the 
sip traffic traversing the kamailio box, it seems that the From and Contact 
headers sent by asterisk are the source of the internal implementation 
information reaching the end-user.

How can I prevent implementation information like this leaking out?  I consider 
this to be a security risk as I don't want anyone to be able to enumerate the 
number of servers that comprise a given cluster as easily as placing a few 
calls, ideally I only want data relating to the public side of the network 
getting out. But I would be happy if it takes digging into the sip traffic to 
glean any details initially.

I'm getting the feeling that this could well be an asterisk configuration 
issue, so apologies if this is a little off topic, however I have been unable 
to find a similar configuration to try and achieve my desired results.

Tim.

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to