Here it goes, apologies for the length: The registration process is done via TLS and therefore I "can not" post the trace. However, the resulting data is the following:
AOR:: s...@domain.com Contact:: sip:83652074@M.N.O.P:34120;transport=tls Q= Expires:: 569 Callid:: iUcVvmbsda9Yu0DGUm4exTHiZYIqwgtZ Cseq:: 2 User-agent:: Blink 0.9.1 (Linux) Received:: sip:M.N.O.P:39961;transport=TLS State:: CS_DIRTY Flags:: 0 Cflag:: 64 Socket:: tls:X.Y.Z.W:5061 Methods:: 4294967295 Ruid:: uloc-53fc870d-1097-4 Instance:: <urn:uuid:d63b1c4f-d7dc-4f4e-87f1-948123266dc0> Reg-Id:: 0 Last-Keepalive:: 1409121941 Last-Modified:: 1409121941 The call trace is the following (Trying and Ringing messages removed for simplicity): U A.B.C.D:5060 -> X.Y.Z.W:5060 INVITE sip:999666...@pstn.domain.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP A.B.C.D:5060;branch=z9hG4bK222c6640..Max-Forwards: 70..From: "111222333" <sip:111222333@A.B.C.D>;tag=as1a7b4c7d..To: <sip:999666...@pstn.domain.com>..Contact: <sip:111222333@A.B.C.D:5060>..Call-ID: 59f5 579c01f8039243ec830d317df994@A.B.C.D:5060..CSeq: 102 INVITE..User-Agent: IPXAdam..Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 06:45:54 GMT..Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH..Supported: replaces, timer..Content-Type: application/sdp..Content-Length: 311....v=0..o=root 936120945 936120945 IN IP4 A.B.C.D..s=Asterisk PBX 11.6-cert2..c=IN IP4 A.B.C.D..t=0 0..m=audio 12018 RTP/AVP 8 3 0 101..a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000..a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000..a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000..a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000..a=fmtp:101 0-16..a=silenceSupp:off - - - -..a=ptime:20..a=sendrecv.. U X.Y.Z.W:5060 -> A.B.C.D:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP A.B.C.D:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK222c6640..Record-Route: <sip:X.Y.Z.W:5061;transport=tls;lr;r2=on;fdrrm=82.63f;nat=yes>..Record-Route: <sip:X.Y.Z.W;lr;r2=on;fdrrm=82.63f;nat=yes>..Call-ID: 59f5579c01f8039243ec830d317df994@A.B.C.D:5060..From: "111222333" <sip:111222333@A.B.C.D>;tag=as1a7b4c7d..To: <sip:999666...@pstn.domain.com>;tag=GcH-CAWXaNVzm0W314zxJF518oM-Okco..CSeq: 102 INVITE..Server: Blink 0.9.1 (Linux)..Allow: SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, MESSAGE, REFER..Contact: <sip:sam@M.N.O.P:39961;transport=tls;gr=urn:uuid:d63b1c4f-d7dc-4f4e-87f1-948123266dc0>..Supported: 100rel, replaces, norefersub, gruu..Content-Type: application/sdp..Content-Length: 236....v=0..o=- 3618110757 3618110758 IN IP4 M.N.O.P..s=Blink 0.9.1 (Linux)..t=0 0..m=audio 50002 RTP/AVP 8 101..c=IN IP4 M.N.O.P..a= rtcp:50003..a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000..a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000..a=fmtp:101 0-15..a=sendrecv.. U A.B.C.D:5060 -> X.Y.Z.W:5060 ACK sip:sam@M.N.O.P:39961;transport=tls;gr=urn:uuid:d63b1c4f-d7dc-4f4e-87f1-948123266dc0 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP A.B.C.D:5060;branch=z9hG4bK22a00025..Route: <sip:X.Y.Z.W;lr;r2=on;fdrrm=82.63f;nat=yes>,<sip:X.Y.Z.W:5061;transport=tls;lr;r2=on;fdrrm=82.63f;nat=yes>..Max-Forwards: 70.. From: "111222333" <sip:111222333@A.B.C.D>;tag=as1a7b4c7d..To: < sip:999666...@pstn.domain.com>;tag=GcH-CAWXaNVzm0W314zxJF518oM-Okco..Contact: <sip:111222333@A.B.C.D:5060>..Call-ID: 59f5579c01f8039243ec830d317df994@A.B.C.D:5060..CSeq: 102 ACK..User-Agent: IPXAdam..Content-Length:0.... What I was refering to is that in the logs the lookup process is using sip:sam@M.N.O.P, which is not found because what exists in the registrar database is s...@domain.com. In the Contact header of the 200 OK the local IP is used instead of the FQDN form. I might have been misleaded by the logs or the gruu lookup process, but in the following lines of the code (you were right about the lines and verion): The first log ouput comes from the following lines of lookup.c: 120 if(puri.gr_val.len>0) { 121 /* pub-gruu */ 122 inst = puri.gr_val; 123 LM_DBG("looking up pub gruu [%.*s]\n", inst.len, inst.s); But afterwards, there are these lines, with the return -1 statement: 154 /* aor or pub-gruu lookup */ 155 ul.lock_udomain(_d, &aor); 156 res = ul.get_urecord(_d, &aor, &r); 157 if (res > 0) { 158 LM_DBG("'%.*s' Not found in usrloc\n", aor.len, ZSW(aor.s)); 159 ul.unlock_udomain(_d, &aor); 160 return -1; 161 } 162 This is the point where I would need expertise help, because it looks like it uses the "short" AoR (without URI gruu parameters) according to the logs and a -1 is returned. Afterwards there are the lines used to lookup the pub and temp gruu but are not, as far as I understand, used because of the return -1. What is my mistake in the above assumption? Thanks a lot for the amazing fast reply. Samuel. On 26 August 2014 18:22, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > can you send a trace that includes the registration as well as the call? > > The pub-gruu is using the AoR, iirc. > > Also, the line you refer to is not matching anymore with latest 4.1.x -- > paste the code around it to locate it properly. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 26/08/14 18:05, samuel wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm having some issues treating requests within dialogs with gruu enabled > with kamailio 4.1.2. > > I've got the "standard" configuration of WITHIN route with the adition of > the next lines: > > if(is_gruu()){ > route(LOCATION); > }; > > before the the RELAY route call in the loose_route section. > > The "problem" is that the ACK with a pub-gruu on the Req-URI is not > properly lookup. In the logs I can see the following statements: > 2(4232) DEBUG: registrar [lookup.c:123]: lookup(): looking up pub gruu > [urn:uuid:d63b1c4f-d7dc-4f4e-87f1-948123266dc0] > 2(4232) DEBUG: registrar [lookup.c:158]: lookup(): 'sam@A.B.C.D' Not > found in usrloc > > Where A.B.C.D is the local IP of the UA. > > Looking at the code, this last line looks like is looking for the > "standard" URI (username@domain) instead of using the pub gruu. Am I > right with this assumption or am I missing something from the code? > As far as I could look, it looks like there's an exit -1 statement in the > line 158 of lookup.c which disables the following gruu treatment. > > Since the username with IP is not registered, this ACK is lost and the > sesion is not stablished (lost ACK). > > Can anyone provide some hints why is this failing? > > Thanks a lot in advance! > Samuel. > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing > listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - > http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 - http://www.asipto.com > Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany ::: Oct 15-17, San Francisco, USA > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users