On 08/26/14 20:58, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 08/26/2014 08:56 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > >> I'd agree 'drop-in' replacement is not correct. I ran into the same >> issues as you. Current there is no bridge-mode in rtpengine, I point >> you to an open issue about it [1]. > > I think the idea behind the formulation of "drop-in replacement" is that > the module interface functions are compatible with the standard > 'rtpproxy' module, so no config changes are required to make it work. > > It doesn't mean that all the old features exist. It means that they are > stubbed out in such a manner as to not invalidate the existing config. > > Even then, that's not entirely true, given the 'rtpengine' nomenclature > change recently.
Correct, the "drop-in replacement" wording was related to the older module rtpproxy-ng. The newer rtpengine module isn't 100% compatible any more, so the docs should probably be changed. cheers _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
