On 05/26/2014 12:32 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote: Ciao,
> On 05/26/2014 12:25 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote: > > Ciao, > >> On 05/26/2014 12:17 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> >> Ciao, >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 26/05/14 12:13, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>>> On 05/26/2014 12:03 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Ciao! >>>> >>>>> >>>>> good that you sent a reminder -- I checked while offline traveling, but >>>>> then forgot to follow up. >>>>> >>>>> I expect that ps->req is null in this case, because there is no request >>>>> received by kamailio. That results in xlog >>>>> not doing anything. >>>>> >>>>> In other words, I expect the event route being executed, just the action >>>>> inside is doesn't do anything in this case. >>>> >>>> Does this mean that I'll have to set a "faked" ps->req in order to get the >>>> event route executed? >>> >>> that's the safe way. The event route is executed, but many functions that >>> you can use inside config routing blocks >>> require a non-null sip message structure. It is the case of xlog() for >>> example, which simply returns -1 if request >>> is null. >> >> Ok! Can you suggest the safest and reasonable way to setup the request for >> this case? > > Ah! No! Wait! The event route is executed within a tm callback via > tmb.t_request() so I'd expect a valid ps->req, > don't you think so? I've found how to change the code ... just testing the logic. I'll get back to you in case. Cheer, Roberto Fichera. > >> >> Cheers, >> Roberto Fichera. >> >>> >>> Cheers, Daniel >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Roberto Fichera. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Daniel >>>>> >>>>> On 26/05/14 11:40, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>>>>> On 05/22/2014 09:08 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>>>>>> On 05/21/2014 11:15 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ciao Daniel, >>>>>> >>>>>> have you had time to look at the problem below? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Roberto Fichera. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ciao, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> can you send the log messages printed with debug=3? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes! Sure! Here it is: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8454]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [receive.c:296]: receive_msg(): >>>>>>> receive_msg: cleaning up >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:633]: >>>>>>> parse_msg(): SIP Reply (status): >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:635]: >>>>>>> parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:637]: >>>>>>> parse_msg(): status: <202> >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:639]: >>>>>>> parse_msg(): reason: <Accepted> >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: >>>>>>> parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = >>>>>>> <z9hG4bK016e.a6c662d4000000000000000....0>; state=6 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: >>>>>>> parse_via_param(): Found param type 235, <rport> = <1169>; state=6 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: >>>>>>> parse_via_param(): Found param type 234, <received> = <xx.xx.xx.xx>; >>>>>>> state=16 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: >>>>>>> parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: >>>>>>> parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: >>>>>>> parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the first via >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [receive.c:152]: receive_msg(): >>>>>>> After parse_msg... >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_lookup.c:1072]: t_check_msg(): >>>>>>> DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=1 global id=0 T start=0xffffffffffffffff >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]: >>>>>>> parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: >>>>>>> tag=74b38630e6be28bab2ebe17319971f33-c57e >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:893]: >>>>>>> parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: >>>>>>> get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [88]; >>>>>>> uri=[sip:te...@test.com] >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: >>>>>>> get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body [<sip:te...@test.com>] >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:170]: >>>>>>> get_hdr_field(): get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <10> <MESSAGE> >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_lookup.c:949]: t_reply_matching(): >>>>>>> DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 58896 label 0 branch 0 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_lookup.c:1004]: t_reply_matching(): >>>>>>> DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x7f21ba974408)! >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_lookup.c:1141]: t_check_msg(): >>>>>>> DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=1 global id=1 T end=0x7f21ba974408 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_reply.c:2206]: reply_received(): >>>>>>> DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=0, uac[0]=0 local=2 is_invite=0) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_reply.c:1304]: >>>>>>> t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=202 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_reply.c:2086]: local_reply(): DEBUG: >>>>>>> local_reply: branch=0, save=0, winner=0 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_reply.c:2123]: local_reply(): DEBUG: >>>>>>> local transaction completed >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_hooks.c:288]: >>>>>>> run_trans_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7f21ba974408, callback >>>>>>> type 1024, id 0 entered >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> msilo [msilo.c:1327]: m_tm_callback(): >>>>>>> completed with status 202 [mid: 139782841221704/4] >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> msilo [msilo.c:1340]: m_tm_callback(): >>>>>>> message <4> was sent successfully >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> msilo [ms_msg_list.c:236]: >>>>>>> msg_list_set_flag(): mid:4 fl:4 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> msilo [msilo.c:1350]: m_tm_callback(): >>>>>>> executing event_route[msilo:on-delivered] (2) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> tm [t_reply.c:1663]: cleanup_uac_timers(): >>>>>>> DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: >>>>>>> destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: >>>>>>> destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: >>>>>>> destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: >>>>>>> destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: >>>>>>> destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: >>>>>>> destroy_avp_list(): DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [xavp.c:448]: xavp_destroy_list(): >>>>>>> destroying xavp list (nil) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:04 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8436]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [receive.c:296]: receive_msg(): >>>>>>> receive_msg: cleaning up >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:08 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8441]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> pike [timer.c:77]: >>>>>>> check_and_split_timer(): splitting >>>>>>> 0x7f21ba98dab0(0x7f21ba7b15f8,0x7f21ba7b15f8)node=0x7f21ba98daa0 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:08 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8441]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> pike [timer.c:102]: >>>>>>> check_and_split_timer(): succ. to split >>>>>>> (h=0x7f21ba7b15f8)(p=0x7f21ba7b15f8,n=0x7f21ba7b15f8) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:08 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8441]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> pike [pike_funcs.c:234]: clean_routine(): >>>>>>> clean node 0x7f21ba98daa0 (kids=(nil); hits=[0,0];leaf=[0,0]) >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:08 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8441]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> pike [pike_funcs.c:265]: clean_routine(): >>>>>>> rmv node 0x7f21ba98daa0[192] >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:08 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8441]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> pike [ip_tree.c:364]: remove_node(): >>>>>>> destroying node 0x7f21ba98daa0 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:10 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8454]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [io_wait.h:617]: io_watch_del(): >>>>>>> DBG: io_watch_del (0x8eb2e0, 9, -1, 0x10) fd_no=2 called >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:10 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8454]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [tcp_read.c:1437]: >>>>>>> release_tcpconn(): releasing con 0x7f21ba9420c0, state 1, fd=9, id=2 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:10 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8454]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [tcp_read.c:1438]: >>>>>>> release_tcpconn(): extra_data 0x7f21ba941028 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:10 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8456]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [tcp_main.c:3385]: >>>>>>> handle_tcp_child(): handle_tcp_child: reader response= 7f21ba9420c0, 1 >>>>>>> from 2 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:10 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8456]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [io_wait.h:390]: io_watch_add(): >>>>>>> DBG: io_watch_add(0x893040, 28, 2, 0x7f21ba9420c0), fd_no=20 >>>>>>> May 22 08:58:10 dragon.tekno-soft.it /usr/sbin/kamailio[8456]: DEBUG: >>>>>>> <core> [tcp_main.c:3515]: >>>>>>> handle_tcp_child(): handle_tcp_child: CONN_RELEASE 0x7f21ba9420c0 >>>>>>> refcnt= 1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Roberto Fichera. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 21/05/14 18:37, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 05/21/2014 09:08 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi There, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 05/20/2014 09:15 PM, Peter Villeneuve wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Roberto, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Did you ever figure out how to do it? >>>>>>>>>>> I'd be interested too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Not yet! I tried other ways, barely workarounds, but I guess I'll >>>>>>>>>> have to go into this >>>>>>>>>> quite soon because it is the straight way to go. The main problem is >>>>>>>>>> the lack of >>>>>>>>>> my knowledge of kamailio API so I'll have to study a bit some code >>>>>>>>>> in order to understand >>>>>>>>>> how to use it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BTW the idea is to trigger an event route were I'd like to set all >>>>>>>>>> the info regarding >>>>>>>>>> the dispatched message including the result of the delivering. I >>>>>>>>>> don't know if is possible >>>>>>>>>> but the best would be to set all the pseudo-variables so that such >>>>>>>>>> event route will be >>>>>>>>>> in the right context of the given MSILO message. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, any advice regarding the API would definitively help and put me >>>>>>>>>> in the right direction. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually I've started to play with the above idea, so below you will >>>>>>>>> find my current implementation >>>>>>>>> which seems executed because I see the LM_DBG() log but the code >>>>>>>>> within the event route but >>>>>>>>> the corresponding script code does not. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any help? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Roberto Fichera. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> event_route [msilo:on-delivered] { >>>>>>>>> xlog("L_INFO", "MSILO event on-delivered <$fu> to <$ru>\n"); >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> diff --git a/modules/msilo/msilo.c b/modules/msilo/msilo.c >>>>>>>>> index 903b3cf..742c48d 100644 >>>>>>>>> --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c >>>>>>>>> +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c >>>>>>>>> @@ -281,6 +281,9 @@ static int bind_msilo(msilo_api_t* api) >>>>>>>>> return 0; >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +/* where to go for the local request route ("msilo:on-delivered") */ >>>>>>>>> +int msilo_event_on_delivered=-1; /* default disabled */ >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> /** >>>>>>>>> * init module function >>>>>>>>> */ >>>>>>>>> @@ -480,6 +483,11 @@ static int mod_init(void) >>>>>>>>> if(ms_outbound_proxy.s!=NULL) >>>>>>>>> ms_outbound_proxy.len = strlen(ms_outbound_proxy.s); >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> + /* check if the on-delivered route event exists or not */ >>>>>>>>> + msilo_event_on_delivered=route_lookup(&event_rt, >>>>>>>>> "msilo:on-delivered"); >>>>>>>>> + if (msilo_event_on_delivered>=0 && >>>>>>>>> event_rt.rlist[msilo_event_on_delivered]==0) >>>>>>>>> + msilo_event_on_delivered=-1; /* disable */ >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> return 0; >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @@ -1330,6 +1338,26 @@ void m_tm_callback( struct cell *t, int type, >>>>>>>>> struct tmcb_params *ps) >>>>>>>>> LM_DBG("message <%d> was sent successfully\n", >>>>>>>>> *((int*)ps->param)); >>>>>>>>> msg_list_set_flag(ml, *((int*)ps->param), MS_MSG_DONE); >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> + /* execute the msilo:on-delivered event route */ >>>>>>>>> + if(unlikely(msilo_event_on_delivered>=0)) >>>>>>>>> + { >>>>>>>>> + int sflag_bk; >>>>>>>>> + int backup_route_type; >>>>>>>>> + struct run_act_ctx ctx; >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> + LM_DBG("executing event_route[msilo:on-delivered] >>>>>>>>> (%d)\n", msilo_event_on_delivered); >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> + sflag_bk = getsflags(); >>>>>>>>> + backup_route_type = get_route_type(); >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> + set_route_type(EVENT_ROUTE); >>>>>>>>> + init_run_actions_ctx(&ctx); >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> run_top_route(event_rt.rlist[msilo_event_on_delivered], ps->req, >>>>>>>>> &ctx); >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> + set_route_type(backup_route_type); >>>>>>>>> + setsflagsval(sflag_bk); >>>>>>>>> + } >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> done: >>>>>>>>> return; >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Roberto Fichera. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Roberto Fichera >>>>>>>>>>> <ker...@tekno-soft.it <mailto:ker...@tekno-soft.it>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 04/17/2014 10:36 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> > On 04/16/2014 07:15 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > Hi All, >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> On 04/16/2014 06:53 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >> Ciao Daniel, >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> most likely the messages are looped back, be sure you allow >>>>>>>>>>> requests from 'myself' without >>>>>>>>>>> authentication. >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> You can watch loopback interface with ngrep to see if the >>>>>>>>>>> messages are sent out. >>>>>>>>>>> >> Yep! Allowing requests from myself solved the problem! >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> Another thing regarding MSILO, I would like to preserve some >>>>>>>>>>> custom header fields >>>>>>>>>>> >> for both instant message and notification. How can I do it? >>>>>>>>>>> > I was able to solve this issue too, pretty straight I mean, >>>>>>>>>>> there is the extra_hdrs_avp param >>>>>>>>>>> > which did the trick. BTW, is there a way to send back the >>>>>>>>>>> notification to the sender that >>>>>>>>>>> > the message has been sent correctly via m_dump(), so to get a >>>>>>>>>>> 200 about the given >>>>>>>>>>> > m_dump()ed message? >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think that this can be solved in a different way, the idea is >>>>>>>>>>> to add an event_route for the msilo >>>>>>>>>>> module so that we get notified for each m_dump()ed message >>>>>>>>>>> about the given IM status and >>>>>>>>>>> then handle it in the cfg file. So, looking at the code within >>>>>>>>>>> m_tm_callback() it seems that it's >>>>>>>>>>> right place where to add such feature. Since I'm not a kamailio >>>>>>>>>>> developer but I've quite long >>>>>>>>>>> time experience in C coding, does anyone can show/point me to >>>>>>>>>>> some example about >>>>>>>>>>> how to do that? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>>>>>>> Roberto Fichera. >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users