On 04/28/2014 04:05 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote: > On 04/28/2014 03:45 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> Hello, > Hi, > >> it doesn't look like a crash at all, but normal behaviour when message is >> too large to send. Or are there other log >> messages you haven't posted here indicating a crash? > Opsss! Sorry! It wasn't a crash, I wrote the wrongly! Indeed it's a normal > error log. > >> You may have to adjust write buffers for tcp -- look at core cookbook, tcp >> parameters section, and identify the ones >> with 'wq' in the name. > are you talking about tcp_wq_blk_size or tcp_wq_max? For the first the > documentation reports > that might be ignored, the latter seems defaulting to 10MB.
Mmmhhh! Maybe it's tcp_conn_wq_max ? > > Cheers, > Roberto Fichera. > > >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 28/04/14 15:29, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm playing with instant messaging with a PJSIP client, but as soon as I >>> send body with payload to about 100k I'm >>> getting the error below: >>> >>> Apr 28 09:16:52 ip-10-227-0-26 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2909]: ERROR: <core> >>> [tcp_main.c:715]: _wbufq_add(): ERROR: >>> wbufq_add(40552 bytes): write queue full or timeout (0, total 0, last >>> write 51946505 s ago) >>> Apr 28 09:16:52 ip-10-227-0-26 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2909]: ERROR: tm >>> [../../forward.h:240]: msg_send(): msg_send: ERROR: >>> tcp_send failed >>> Apr 28 09:16:52 ip-10-227-0-26 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2910]: ERROR: <core> >>> [tcp_main.c:3638]: handle_ser_child(): >>> handle_ser_child: ERROR: received CON_ERROR for 0xb30ddcd8 (id 352), refcnt >>> 2, flags 0x5092 >>> Apr 28 09:16:52 ip-10-227-0-26 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2909]: ERROR: tm >>> [t_fwd.c:1609]: t_send_branch(): ERROR: >>> t_send_branch: sending request on branch 0 failed >>> Apr 28 09:16:52 ip-10-227-0-26 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2909]: ERROR: sl >>> [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: >>> sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred >>> (477/SL) >>> >>> And the app get >>> >>> SIP/2.0 477 Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) >>> Via: SIP/2.0/TLS >>> XX.XX.XX.XX:55859;rport=55859;branch=z9hG4bKPjkkazEy.XcjJkYDCEzwbwUVAONDzcCN8t;alias >>> From: <sip:aa...@test.net>;tag=9gcb.Ay3wSCZNFgs8PNCbdkRq7jfxbDx >>> To: <sip:bb...@test.net>;tag=9a285338e10af1c086406d08dc7f5d79.e457 >>> Call-ID: v9JlsK1AEH4So8AIEfqiGuUOEx5Fub1C >>> CSeq: 28450 MESSAGE >>> Server: kamailio (4.1.3 (i386/linux)) >>> Content-Length: 0 >>> --end msg-- >>> >>> Kamailio is already set with tcp_rd_buf_size=204800 >>> >>> Does anyone can suggest how to fix this? >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> Roberto Fichera. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users