Fred, in you ACME replacement, kamailio doesn’t rewrite headers for handling RTP/SIGNALING and stay in the middle?
Il giorno 21/feb/2014, alle ore 00:03, Fred Posner <f...@palner.com> ha scritto: > On 2/20/14, 5:55 PM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote: >> @Carsten >> I looked at http://www.iptel.org/sems and seems to be only broken links to >> downloads. >> Do you know if the project is still maintained? >> >> @Fred >> Are you using openser as a B2BUA? > > No, because of course Kamailio is not a b2bua. =) > > In the case of the ACME replacement, we used it to: > > - handle NAT (rtpproxy) > - user regs > - load balance > - lcr > - security > - routing > > and some other little hacks. > > -- > Fred Posner | The Palner Group, Inc. > http://qxork.com > >> >> Il giorno 20/feb/2014, alle ore 19:42, Fred Posner <f...@palner.com> ha >> scritto: >> >>> Alex's article is one of my favorites. That being said, we switched out an >>> Acme SBC for openser (at the time) and was immediately thrilled. >>> >>> Fred Posner >>> The Palner Group, Inc. >>> 503-914-0999 (direct) >>> 954-472-2896 (fax) >>> >>> On 02/20/2014 01:14 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: >>>> Francesco, >>>> >>>> Have a look at this blog post: >>>> >>>> http://www.likewise.am/2013/03/kamailio-as-an-sbc-session-border-controller/ >>>> >>>> >>>> That said, I agree with Carsten's suggestion of SEMS. >>>> >>>> On 02/20/2014 11:04 AM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an >>>>> ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller. >>>>> By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly: >>>>> >>>>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations >>>>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP >>>>> carriers via SIP trunks >>>>> - it is used for NAT traversal >>>>> >>>>> In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the SBC and >>>>> this one takes care of the communication between the SIP Server and >>>>> the external SIP entities (UA clients, SIP Trunks). >>>>> In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
