I think I've caught! I capture this packet sended by Asterisk.
# U 2013/11/12 11:01:56.613522 XX.XX:XX.XX:5060 -> YY:YY:YY:YY:5060 OPTIONS sip:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXt SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.1.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2ad587ba;rport. Max-Forwards: 70. From: "Unknown" <sip:Unknown@172.16.1.2>;tag=as1fadd872. To: <sip:XXXXXXXXXXXXt>. Contact: <sip:Unknown@172.16.1.2>. Call-ID: 57182fc0100063057d51b3d6680e1767@172.16.1.2. CSeq: 102 OPTIONS. User-Agent: FPBX-2.9.0(1.6.2.13). Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:01:52 GMT. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO. Supported: replaces, timer. Content-Length: 0. I think that Kamailio can't answer to this packet. Maybe Asterisk have a bug? I'm thinking about desactivate qualify in Asterisk. What do you think? Regards. 2013/11/11 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> > Hello, > > On 11/11/13 9:02 AM, Francisco Casasempere wrote: > > Hi list, > > I have this structure > > IP Phones -> Asterisk Client (LAN) -> (router) -> > Kamailio/RTPproxy(Internet) -> Asterisk (local from Kamailio) -> Trunk > SIP/Pstn > > All is working well, I don't have problems with NAT and I managed about > 6000 daily calls. > > For a couple of months I've the next problem.The problem is that in the > Asterisk randomly received this message. > > [Sep 29 04:04:29] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamONOp' is now Lagged. > (2075ms / 2000ms) > [Sep 29 04:04:41] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamailioONO' is now > Reachable. (1888ms / 2000ms) > > In some Asterisk Client I get this message 10 times in a hour, and > usually coincide with periods of high load on the kamailo. > > might be related to the response time to OPTIONS requests sent by > Asterisk. Be sure you reply to them quickly in kamailio.cfg. > > > Also I am getting these messages in the log of Kamailio: > > Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8079]: INFO: <core> > [forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via > Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8082]: INFO: <core> > [forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via > > Are these two issues related? > > This is info message, not an error at all. It means that the sip reply > processed is very likely for a local request. I guess you have an older > version of kamailio, the log message is different to suggest better the > situation, as it is not a broken reply. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > Whay can I do? > > Kind Regards > > > SiscoCS > > (Sorry for my english) > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing > listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda > - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28 > - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com - > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
