Check the avp documentation at http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/avpops.html and http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/tutorials:avpops
/Morten On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Keith <ke...@hubner.co.uk> wrote: > Also I would like to try and store these numbers in a the DB somehow to > minimise code. > > Keith > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:40 PM, <sr-users-requ...@lists.sip-router.org>wrote: > >> Send sr-users mailing list submissions to >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> sr-users-requ...@lists.sip-router.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> sr-users-ow...@lists.sip-router.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Destination number restriction (Keith) >> 2. Re: append_hf to reply generated by kamailio (Grant Bagdasarian) >> 3. Re: append_hf to reply generated by kamailio (Grant Bagdasarian) >> 4. Re: append_hf to reply generated by kamailio (Klaus Darilion) >> 5. Re: Destination number restriction (Morten Isaksen) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:14:10 +0100 >> From: Keith <ke...@hubner.co.uk> >> To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - >> Users Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> Subject: [SR-Users] Destination number restriction >> Message-ID: >> <CAK7Ybu8= >> jnk+p4aseb66xp6_3juqxo1jhqbipvabdoeg5gj...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> Hi, >> >> I am looking to restrict calls based on destination numbers, e.g. so >> people >> can't call premium rate etc. Which module is best to achieve this? >> >> Thanks, >> Keith >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131003/b0f780c0/attachment-0001.html >> > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:31:25 +0200 >> From: Grant Bagdasarian <g...@cm.nl> >> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" >> <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] append_hf to reply generated by kamailio >> Message-ID: >> >> <FB7D97A214987F458242ACBDF87614073B1C757D31@clubvirtual40.ClubMessage.local >> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Replacing the exit statement with return, does the trick. The reply >> reaches the onreply_route and that's where I add the header, but after a >> while it generates a 483 Too Many Hops. >> My capture server also receives a lot of INVITE, ACK, 603 messages. A lot >> of Via and Record-Route headers are added to the INVITE and 603 (Via only). >> >> Why does this happen? >> >> From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto: >> sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Grant Bagdasarian >> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 11:39 AM >> To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> Subject: [SR-Users] append_hf to reply generated by kamailio >> >> Hello, >> >> Is it possible to append a new header to a reply generated by Kamailio >> and also have it present when duplicating the message to a capture server? >> At the moment the 603 Reply is duplicated to my capture server, but I >> don't know how to append a new header, because the kamailio script stops >> executing after exit is called. >> >From what I understood: onreply_route is only executed when receiving >> replies. >> >> Is there a reply_route which is executed for all replies, including the >> ones generated by kamailio itself? >> >> For instance inside this code block: >> >> request_route { >> >> ..... >> >> if($var(routing_query_result) =~ >> "DESTINATION_NOT_ALLOWED") { >> xlog("L_INFO", >> "[R-CORE-INCOMING-INVITE:$ci] !>" "Rejecting the call, because the >> destination is not allowed\r\n"); >> sl_send_reply("603", "Decline"); >> exit; >> } >> >> ..... >> >> } >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131003/1b8d073f/attachment-0001.html >> > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:57:22 +0200 >> From: Grant Bagdasarian <g...@cm.nl> >> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" >> <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] append_hf to reply generated by kamailio >> Message-ID: >> >> <FB7D97A214987F458242ACBDF87614073B1C757D49@clubvirtual40.ClubMessage.local >> > >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> My bad, I forgot to make something clear. >> >> The IF statement is in a different route which is called by de main >> request_route. So when the return statement is executed the control is >> passed back to the main request_route, which in turn relays the INVITE back >> to itself. That's probably causing the 483 Too Many Hops response? >> >> From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto: >> sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Grant Bagdasarian >> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 12:31 PM >> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] append_hf to reply generated by kamailio >> >> Replacing the exit statement with return, does the trick. The reply >> reaches the onreply_route and that's where I add the header, but after a >> while it generates a 483 Too Many Hops. >> My capture server also receives a lot of INVITE, ACK, 603 messages. A lot >> of Via and Record-Route headers are added to the INVITE and 603 (Via only). >> >> Why does this happen? >> >> From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org<mailto: >> sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org> [mailto: >> sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Grant Bagdasarian >> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 11:39 AM >> To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> Subject: [SR-Users] append_hf to reply generated by kamailio >> >> Hello, >> >> Is it possible to append a new header to a reply generated by Kamailio >> and also have it present when duplicating the message to a capture server? >> At the moment the 603 Reply is duplicated to my capture server, but I >> don't know how to append a new header, because the kamailio script stops >> executing after exit is called. >> >From what I understood: onreply_route is only executed when receiving >> replies. >> >> Is there a reply_route which is executed for all replies, including the >> ones generated by kamailio itself? >> >> For instance inside this code block: >> >> request_route { >> >> ..... >> >> if($var(routing_query_result) =~ >> "DESTINATION_NOT_ALLOWED") { >> xlog("L_INFO", >> "[R-CORE-INCOMING-INVITE:$ci] !>" "Rejecting the call, because the >> destination is not allowed\r\n"); >> sl_send_reply("603", "Decline"); >> exit; >> } >> >> ..... >> >> } >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131003/d203f913/attachment-0001.html >> > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:37:25 +0200 >> From: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at> >> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" >> <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] append_hf to reply generated by kamailio >> Message-ID: <524d56f5.4020...@pernau.at> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed >> >> Use append_to_reply(txt) before sl_send_reply(): >> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/textops.html#idp17040608 >> >> regards >> Klaus >> >> On 03.10.2013 11:38, Grant Bagdasarian wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > Is it possible to append a new header to a reply generated by Kamailio >> > and also have it present when duplicating the message to a capture >> server? >> > >> > At the moment the 603 Reply is duplicated to my capture server, but I >> > don?t know how to append a new header, because the kamailio script stops >> > executing after exit is called. >> > >> > From what I understood: onreply_route is only executed when receiving >> > replies. >> > >> > Is there a reply_route which is executed for all replies, including the >> > ones generated by kamailio itself? >> > >> > For instance inside this code block: >> > >> > request_route { >> > >> > ..... >> > >> > if($var(routing_query_result) =~ >> > "DESTINATION_NOT_ALLOWED") { >> > >> > xlog("L_INFO", >> > "[R-CORE-INCOMING-INVITE:$ci] !>" "Rejecting the call, because the >> > destination is not allowed\r\n"); >> > >> > sl_send_reply("603", "Decline"); >> > >> > exit; >> > >> > } >> > >> > ..... >> > >> > } >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:40:36 +0200 >> From: Morten Isaksen <mi...@misak.dk> >> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" >> <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Destination number restriction >> Message-ID: >> <CAAyFOkH7nh= >> 3d7yj4dxjvrpqmmggoqvia8brauj+4v_e5hx...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> We use something like this: >> >> if ((uri =~ "^sip:90[0-9]{6}@.*") && >> (!avp_check("$avp(s:perms)","re/9/g"))) { >> xlog("$ru : No permissions to call 90X numbers ($ci)"); >> sl_send_reply("403", "No permissions to call 90XXXXXX"); >> exit; >> } >> >> and then store the information in usr_prefences table. >> >> /Morten >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Keith <ke...@hubner.co.uk> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am looking to restrict calls based on destination numbers, e.g. so >> > people can't call premium rate etc. Which module is best to achieve >> this? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Keith >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Morten Isaksen >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131003/319d28bb/attachment.html >> > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sr-users mailing list >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> End of sr-users Digest, Vol 101, Issue 22 >> ***************************************** >> > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- Morten Isaksen
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
