Hi, On 20 August 2013 23:37, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would use also the tags - something like: > - save for invite: > $sht(x=>$ci::$ft) = $sel(contact.uri); > - save for 200ok of invite > $sht(x=>$ci::$tt) = $sel(contact.uri); > > For bye, if uri==myself, then if $sht(x=>$ci::$tt)!=$null then $ru = > $sht(x=>$ci::$tt) > I've got something that works for my simple test case. But could you just explain one thing for me: When the upstream service sends back the 407 to the initial INVITE, the kamalio.cfg processes that via failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE]. That calls route[NATMANAGE]. Its in NATMANAGE where I put my code to save the contact. But I'm surprised to see that "is_request()" is apparently true at that time: My code says "if ( is_request() && ($ft != $null) && ($sel(contact.uri) != $null) ) ...." - ie its a request, there is a from_tag, and there is a contact: uri. In that case I save the contact.uri and xlog a message. I see the message, and the contact is (re-)saved. Its harmless since the contact in the 407 is the same contact that was in the INVITE. But to improve my understanding, which is is_request true for the 407 which surely is a reply? Is there documentation I have missed which will help me understand the "architecture" and internal logic flow of Kamailio better? Thanks, Steve
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users