Hello,
On 8/14/13 11:26 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:20 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
On 8/14/13 11:16 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:19 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
as you can see in the REGISTER, the phone give a public IP where it can be
contacted and kamailio tries to deliver to
that address sip:528@94.94.X.X:1274;transport=TCP
REGISTER comes from another port, but that is allowed in SIP.
Yep! That's the problem
You should disable stun in the client and let the server care of nat traversal.
As already said all client doesn't use any stun-
then how they discover the public IP address if they are behind NAT? Or did I
misunderstand that they are behind NAT?
Yes! They are behind NAT! Shouldn't kamailio detect such behaviour so it will
change the contact header and the other
fields accordingly using the nat_fix_XXXX functions?
detection of whether a device is behind nat is done based on comparing
source IP of the packet with the IP addresses in the SIP message. It is
no other way from application point of view.
If you look at the trace, the REGISTER has only public IP addresses, no
private address. Also, the Via header is perfectly matching the the
source IP and port of the packet.
Therefore, if the device is behind a nat in a private network, how does
it discover the public IP or the NAT router? Is the nat router running a
SIP ALG? Can you get the SIP trace on the device itself?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
