On 07/07/13 19:19, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Last question from me. Does mediaproxy-ng have the media based
> accounting functionality that the original mediaproxy have? We
> currently have a problem where we are using RTPProxy along with
> CDRTool instead of the MediaProxy because of the lack for NAT support.
> This seems to be one of the reason for mediaproxy-ng? The problem we
> are having is that there are directives included in CDRTool such as
>
> '%{SIP-Codecs}', '%{SIP-RPID}', '%{SIP-RPID-Header}', ''%{Rate}', \
> '%{Price}', '%{Normalized}', '%{Billing-ID}', '%{MediaInfo}',
> '%{RTPStatistics}'
>
> That are useless for RTPPProxy. More importantly RTPProxy does not
> support precise media based accounting which MediaProxy does. We
> really need this.Despite its name, mediaproxy-ng is not supposed to be a replacement or enhancement to any other existing media/RTP proxy out there. So no, there's no support for any real accounting whatsoever. cheers
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
