Hello,

I don't recall any change in this aspect, are the two branches going to same destination?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 5/13/13 2:43 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Hello,

Has something changed about default forking behaviour in >= 4.0?

I have a scenario where INVITEs processed by the proxy first hit a redirect server, catch a 302, and then append another branch and iterate over one or more outbound routes.

In the past, this worked fine. After I upgraded to 4.0, I am seeing two branches at a time on the outbound routes, after the initial branch to the redirect server. The desired behaviour is serial forking at all times.

tm:failure_reply_mode is set to 3, as it always has been.

Any ideas would be appreciated;  thank you!

-- Alex


--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24-27, 2013
  * http://asipto.com/u/katu *


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to