Yes, i meant the FROM and TO. I think in version 3.2.0 the headers had theses < >.... So, even if the user agents (vendors stacks) are at fault.... how can i deal with it? any ideas?
>You probably meant the To and From headers, I'm guessing. > >Yeah, as long as there is no display name component, URIs in headers like that don't have to go in <>s. The way >Kamailio sends it is grammatically valid, per RFC 3261. The user agents are at fault for not understanding it correctly. > > >Alex Balashov <abalashov at >evaristesys.com<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>> wrote: > >*"BYE headers"? Which headers? *>* *>*Uri Shacked <ushacked at >gmail.com<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>> wrote: *>* *>>*Hi, *>>* *>>*I think there is a bug with the BYE that is sent to the caller and *>>*callee *>>*when dialog timeout happends. *>>* *>> *The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">". *>>*So, some sip singaling points decline the BYE. *>>* *>>*BR, *>>*Uri * On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Uri Shacked <ushac...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think there is a bug with the BYE that is sent to the caller and callee > when dialog timeout happends. > > The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">". > So, some sip singaling points decline the BYE. > > BR, > Uri > > >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
