So if I wont use the drop reply I might get what I need? בתאריך 7 בנוב 2012 18:10, מאת "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at >:
> Ingoring accounting, such "sequential forking" scenarios are usually > solved by having the forkin logic in a failure-route. > > - 1st callee sends 486 > - failure route is executed, if winning response is 486, set the new > destination and t_relay(). > > I do not know how this single transaction with 2 branches is reflected in > the acc table, but I guess you can implement any acc behavior using manual > accounting. > > regards > Klaus > > On 07.11.2012 16:29, Uri Shacked wrote: > >> To be more accurate - I am using the "t_set_fr()" it generates 408 and >> sends cancel to the destination. >> >> This is the case that i do not see a final reply for the first invite. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Uri Shacked <ushac...@gmail.com >> <mailto:ushac...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I am trying to make an option of "route when no answer" or " route >> when busy". >> What I am doing is checking the reply and if "busy", for example, I >> use "t_drop_replies". Then, I set the new number and route[relay] >> again. >> On the accdb table, I get the first invite with 183 and after that >> the second invite with 183 and with 200. >> I would like to do exactly what i do, but would like to see on the >> accdb the 486 reply from the first invite. >> how do i do it? >> BR, >> Uri >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**users<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> >> >>
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
