Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

> why is that? in failure_route I call rtpproxy_mange() which calls 
> unforce_rtp_proxy() which destroys the initiated session.

as explained in earlier messages of this thread, the situation unused
rtp sessions pile up happens, e.g., when call parallel forks and some
forks that needed rtpproxy respond negatively, e.g., with 480, and one
responses with 200.  thus failure route never gets called that would
allow you to destroy the initiated session.

-- juha

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to