Ovidiu Sas writes:
> I forgot to reply to you that I added that warning in the code for the
> same reason.
> What do you mean by a parameter that disables looking for the socket?
hi ovidiu,
the piece of code currently looks like this:
if (enable_double_rr && is_2rr(&puri.params)) {
/* double route may occure due different IP and port,
so force as
* send interface the one advertise in second Route */
if
(parse_uri(rt->nameaddr.uri.s,rt->nameaddr.uri.len,&puri)<0) {
LM_ERR("failed to parse the double route
URI\n");
return RR_ERROR;
}
si = grep_sock_info( &puri.host, puri.port_no,
puri.proto);
if (si) {
set_force_socket(_m, si);
} else {
if (enable_socket_mismatch_warning)f
LM_WARN("no socket found for match
second RR\n");
}
when the "disable socket check" parameter would have been given either
globally or per loose_route() call, then this part of the code would not
be executed at all:
si = grep_sock_info( &puri.host, puri.port_no,
puri.proto);
if (si) {
set_force_socket(_m, si);
} else {
if (enable_socket_mismatch_warning)f
LM_WARN("no socket found for match
second RR\n");
}
which would save some cpu cycles.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
