Hi, When there is no over contention of the physical machines that run your VM machines on all is ok.
However finding/ fixing issues around I/O is made harder by having virtual devices since all types of I/O are affected. My preference is the same as yours. Regards, Bou -----Original Message----- From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla Sent: 28 August 2012 07:19 To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users] [ot] virtualization systems Hello, just asking to see your experience deploying sip platforms on virtual systems. So far I was running Kamailio in virtual machines and no problems, but I insisted that media servers to be on physical machines. Lately is more pressure from the market to go everything virtual. So the question is more about having everything on virtual systems, proxy and media server, where the media server can deal with transcoding, conference rooms and IVRs. Any strong comments pro or against? What is your preferred virtualization system for such deployments? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
