AVPs are associated with the transaction. If you "spiral" a request through the same proxy, then for the proxy it is a new transaction. Thus, when processing the request a second time, there is a new transaction and you do not have access to the AVPs of the previous transaction.

Workarounds are:
- store data in SIP headers and retrieve it later (ugly)
- use htable module to store data during transaction 1 and retrieve it during transaction 2. Therefore you need a known "key" which is identical in this 2 transactions only (e.g. use "$ci$ft" as base for the key).

regards
Klaus




On 07.08.2012 00:27, Brandon Armstead wrote:
Hello,

    I am curious if there is any documentation on how AVP's processing
works in the following scenario below.

UAC 1 -> KAMAILIO -> KAMAILIO -> DEST

It seems that AVP's I set between UAC 1 -> KAMAILIO are lost once I
relay back to the same KAMAILIO proxy (self)?

Is there any documentation on why or when this would occur?

Is there a better way to handle such a scenario?  i.e. more dynamic
internal routing, vs relaying to self.

Thanks as always in advance!

Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to