Hello,
for solaris sparc64 you have to find the option for compiler not to
build with strict alignment requirement for structures. I checked
quickly on the web in some man pages, but I am not sure I got the right
solution (what I previously sent on this thread).
If anyone can allocate resources to check all the structure, will be
another variant, at some time/money expence, but I guess the fast will
be the right flag to compiler.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 7/2/12 12:47 AM, Omar Labs 188 Gmail wrote:
I tried in solaris the version kamailio 3.3.0 Bus error. For solaris I have had
that same issue in any version above the 1.4.3.
If i test in Suse, kamailio crashes when the radius or Diameter module is
enabled. this i tested with versions 3.1 3.2 i am checking if i can get the gdb
for all this.
I was unable to build it yet for 3.3.0
thank you
O
On Jun 30, 2012, at 8:54 PM, Omar Labs 188 Gmail wrote:
Just to let you know
I made a lot of tests using different modules including carrierroute, I do have
the bus error also after the first call and core dump.
thank you
O
On Jun 27, 2012, at 11:45 PM, Akan wrote:
Daniel,
i did a repull from git, compiled, installed and re-test of Kamailio and got
the same error in the same program's location as previous (in tm_funcs.c). Here
are the commands that I entered to make sure I did everything correctly:
mkdir -p /usr/local/src/kamailio/kamailio-3.2-noalignment
cd /usr/local/src/kamailio/kamailio-3.2-noalignment
git clone --depth 1 git://git.sip-router.org/sip-router kamailio
cd kamailio
|gmake proper
gmake prefix=/opt/kamailio-3.2 FLAVOUR=kamailio cfg
vi modules.lst
| gmake prefix=/opt/kamailio-3.2 Q=0 CC_EXTRA_OPTS=|-mno-faster-structs all
|gmake prefix=/opt/kamailio-3.2 Q=0 CC_EXTRA_OPTS=|-mno-faster-structs install
Makefile:363: config.mak: No such file or directory
normal Makefile.defs exec
target architecture <sparc64>, host architecture <sparc64>
generating autover.h ...
making config...
Makefile.defs defs skipped
gcc -g -O9 -funroll-loops -m64 -mcpu=ultrasparc -mtune=ultrasparc -fno-strict-overflow -ftree-vectorize -Wall -mno-faster-structs
-DNAME='"ser"' -DVERSION='"3.2.3"' -DARCH='"sparc64"' -DOS='solaris_' -DOS_QUOTED='"solaris"'
-DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.6.2"' -D__CPU_sparc64 -D__OS_solaris -DSER_VER=3002003 -DCFG_DIR='"/opt/kamailio-3.2/etc/ser/"'
-DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DUSE_DNS_CACHE
-DUSE_DNS_FAILOVER -DUSE_DST_BLACKLIST -DUSE_NAPTR -DWITH_XAVP -DDBG_QM_MALLOC -DUSE_TLS -DTLS_HOOKS -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT
-DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DCC_GCC_LIKE_ASM -DSPARC64_MODE -DHAVE_GETIPNODEBYNAME -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H
-DUSE_SIGACTION -DHAVE_DEVPOLL -DHAVE_SELECT -DHAVE_FILIO_H -c endianness.c -o endianness.o -MMD -MP
gcc -g -O9 -funroll-loops -m64 -mcpu=ultrasparc -mtune=ultrasparc -fno-strict-overflow -ftree-vectorize -Wall -mno-faster-structs
-DNAME='"ser"' -DVERSION='"3.2.3"' -DARCH='"sparc64"' -DOS='solaris_' -DOS_QUOTED='"solaris"'
-DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.6.2"' -D__CPU_sparc64 -D__OS_solaris -DSER_VER=3002003 -DCFG_DIR='"/opt/kamailio-3.2/etc/ser/"'
-DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DUSE_DNS_CACHE
-DUSE_DNS_FAILOVER -DUSE_DST_BLACKLIST -DUSE_NAPTR -DWITH_XAVP -DDBG_QM_MALLOC -DUSE_TLS -DTLS_HOOKS -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT
-DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DCC_GCC_LIKE_ASM -DSPARC64_MODE -DHAVE_GETIPNODEBYNAME -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H
-DUSE_SIGACTION -DHAVE_DEVPOLL -DHAVE_SELECT -DHAVE_FILIO_H -c select_buf.c -o select_buf.o -MMD -MP
||
Thanks
Nathaniel
|
On 6/25/2012 3:05 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
thanks for troubleshooting further -- as I expected, it is a memalign problem,
but some confusing reports by not using always the patches I made to registrar
module to align the structure, made thinking is something else. Now is no
longer in registrar, but in another module.
There might be many of these, can you try to compile first without strict
alignment to 8 bytes? Checking quickly to gcc, the option should be
|-mno-faster-structs
So try:
make proper
make FLAVOUR=kamailio cfg|
make Q=0 CC_EXTRA_OPTS=|-mno-faster-structs all|
...
By providing Q=0, you will see all compile flags, verify that
|-mno-faster-structs is there.
Cheers,
Daniel
|
On 6/22/12 3:26 PM, Akan wrote:
Hello,
After doing some research, this is what I found out. On Solaris Sparc 64bit
system, there is a mandatory alignment of memory accesses and also for data
types. I went thru the core dump, disassembled the code and located the
instruction that produced the error. The registers addresses in questioned are
on a 4 byte alignment but not an 8 byte or 16 byte alignment. .The earlier
patch must have forced the alignment which is why the error did not occur in
the program common.c. It looks like there is a similar situation in t_funcs.c.
Here is a link that I found that can better explain:
http://blog.jgc.org/2007/04/debugging-solaris-bus-error-caused-by.html
Core was generated by `/opt/kamailio-3.2/sbin/kamailio'.
Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
#0 0xffffffff7bd2b7bc in t_relay_to (p_msg=0x10047c698, proxy=0x0, proto=0,
replicate=0) at t_funcs.c:352
352 if (!t_reply( t, p_msg , 100 ,
0xffffffff7bd2b7b0 <+976>: ldx [ %l7 + %g1 ], %g1
0xffffffff7bd2b7b4 <+980>: ldx [ %g1 ], %g1
0xffffffff7bd2b7b8 <+984>: call 0xffffffff7be9bc80 <t_reply@plt>
*=> 0xffffffff7bd2b7bc <+988>: ldx [ %g1 + 0x38 ], %o3*
0xffffffff7bd2b7c0 <+992>: cmp %o0, 0
0xffffffff7bd2b7c4 <+996>: be,pn %icc, 0xffffffff7bd2bb14 <t_relay_to+1844>
0xffffffff7bd2b7c8 <+1000>: ldx [ %fp + 0x7f7 ], %o0
0xffffffff7bd2b7cc <+1004>: b %xcc, 0xffffffff7bd2b460 <t_relay_to+128>
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) info registers g1
g1 0xffffffff7666c3e4 -2308520988
(gdb) info registers o3
o3 0x18f3d0 1635280
I hope this helps in trying to resolve this problem and to find a solution.
Also, if you need a sparc system to test with, just let me know. We can help
from a sparc perspective.
Thanks
Nathaniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012
-http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012
-http://asipto.com/u/kpw
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2437/5091 - Release Date: 06/24/12
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
