Hey Mino,

>From your packet captures above it looks like your ACK is coming in another
IP address. I also see that you are doing the packet capture across all
your physical interfaces (-i any). Perhaps your Kamailio is only configured
to listen on the one interface (the one *not* getting the ACK).

To test limit your packet capture to only the interface/s that you know
Kamailio is listening on.

Cheers
Jason

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Mino Haluz <mino.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We are troubleshooting this issue almost for 2 days and we did not find
> the solution yet. The thing is, that it does not enter even the config file
> (we have some debug messages at the start, that do not show). Otherwise we
> do not have any problem with ACK, but only this particular ACK is not
> forwarded... Was there some bug related to parsing in 3.1.0 which would not
> print any error to syslog?
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Jason Penton 
> <jason.pen...@smilecoms.com>wrote:
>
>> Seems like a loose routing issue. Are you loose routing in your config
>> file?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Stoyan Mihaylov <
>> stoyan.v.mihay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You can use something like wireshark on Kamailio server to see if ACK
>>> packets go in right direction.
>>> I had problem with ACK and BYE, and I saw that in some cases ACK and BYE
>>> packets looped back in kamailio.
>>> May be I used wrong client.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Efelin Novak <efelin.no...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> I have a strange problem when Kamailio ignores ACKs in a specific
>>>> scenario. The call flow is as follows:
>>>>
>>>> A -> INVITE -> kamailio -> INVITE -> B
>>>> [omitting 100 and 180]
>>>> A <- 200 OK <- kamailio <- 200 OK <- B
>>>> A -> ACK -> kamailio
>>>>
>>>> There are INVITE Xlogs, Reply ROUTE xlogs and media-proxy logs in the
>>>> syslog. However there is no information about these ACKs. No XLOGs are
>>>> printed even if there is one on the top of the main route.
>>>>
>>>> "tcpdump -A -s0 -i any -n port 5060" receives this message correctly:
>>>>
>>>> 14:47:01.246153 IP 111.111.11.11.5060 > 80.80.80.80.60442: SIP, length:
>>>> 915
>>>> SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>> 111.111.11.11:5060
>>>> ;rport=60442;x-route-tag="tgrp:A";branch=z9hG4bK1634E6A88
>>>> Record-Route:
>>>> <sip:111.111.11.11;lr;ftag=599248D4-260;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW0FVT0ZWHF1aNy4xGzA-;nat=yes;did=3bb.327c47e6>
>>>> Contact: <sip:80.80.80.80:65002;transport=udp>
>>>> To: "test_account"<sip:b...@server.com>;tag=cb7dd641
>>>> From: <sip:alice@111.111.11.50>;tag=599248D4-260
>>>> Call-ID: 9AFCFC51.11.50
>>>> CSeq: 101 INVITE
>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, OPTIONS, INFO,
>>>> SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE
>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>> Content-Length:263
>>>>
>>>> v=0
>>>> o=- 492575093 492575093 IN IP4 111.111.11.60
>>>> s=test_device
>>>> i=(o=IN IP4 192.168.1.10)
>>>> c=IN IP4 111.111.11.71
>>>> t=0 0
>>>> m=audio 16416 RTP/AVP 18 101
>>>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
>>>> a=fmtp:18 annexb=no
>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-15
>>>> a=ptime:20
>>>>
>>>> 14:47:01.254511 IP 111.111.11.50.60442 > 111.111.11.11.5060: SIP,
>>>> length: 521
>>>> ACK sip:80.80.80.80:65002;transport=udp SIP/2.0
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>> 111.111.11.50:5060;x-route-tag="tgrp:A";branch=z9hG4bK1634E7DE8
>>>> From: <sip:alice@111.111.11.50>;tag=599248D4-260
>>>> To: "test_account"<sip:b...@server.com>;tag=cb7dd641
>>>> Call-ID: 9AFCFC51.11.50
>>>> Route:
>>>> <sip:111.111.11.11;lr;ftag=599248D4-260;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW0FVT0ZWHF1aNy4xGzA-;nat=yes;did=3bb.327c47e6>
>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>> CSeq: 101 ACK
>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>
>>>> My Kamailio version is kamailio 3.1.0 (i386/linux) 1e204f.
>>>> Does anybody knows where can be a problem?
>>>> How can I check whether Kamailio receives something?
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>> This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications (PTY) Ltd. 
>> at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>

This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications (PTY) Ltd. at 
http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to