Hello,
On 11/30/11 11:59 AM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Now I understood why the messagem is forward with UDP protocol... This
problem occurs with bria on android plataform, this softphone send the
INVITE request with tls protocol specified only on the contact header.
Contact: "XXX" <sip:x...@yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:YYY;transport=TLS>.
as Daniel pointed out, "The contact header address is not used for
routing SIP requests, only Route headers and R-URI addresses"
In this case, I should add the transport protocol TLS on R-URI before
to forward message with t_relay function... Correct?
it is not clear for me why you need to forward on TLS if the destination
address is not requiring that. Maybe you can draw a diagram showing the
call flow, who is on TLS and how is happening at this moment and what
you would like to happen.
Cheers,
Daniel
Cheers
2011/11/29 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com
<mailto:mico...@gmail.com>>
On 11/29/11 6:24 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Thank's for attention Andrew
I'm reading the source code of tm module to try understand better
this behavior...
I can't understand what meaning that "the outbound proxy address
is set"... where I define this address?
Outbound proxy address is stored in an internal structure, it is
not part of a SIP request. It represents the address where to send
the request, regardless of request URI (r-uri) address. One common
use case is when dealing with NAT routers, the r-uri is set to the
contact address of the destination phone and the outbound proxy
address is set to the NAT router.
From configuration file, you can access it via $du (read and write
via assignment operation). There are couple of modules that may
set the outbound proxy address, like registrar/usrloc, rr, lcr...
Maybe the best is to post here an ngrep with the SIP trace of such
case, that we can see if something is wrong.
Cheers,
Daniel
2011/11/29 Andrew Pogrebennyk <apogreben...@sipwise.com
<mailto:apogreben...@sipwise.com>>
Bruno,
the address from contact header is put into R-URI on outgoing
request to
that user. This is where I catch that parameter. I think we
should debug
why kamailio sends the request using UDP, it is not clear, as
Daniel
pointed out it should work automatically. I think I had to do
these
manipulations because in my case the outbound proxy address
is set
On 11/29/2011 05:38 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
> In my case the transport=TLS is present in contact header,
has the same
> treatment of R-URI?
>
> Cheers
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin:http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
