Hey,
Am 02.11.2011 um 08:24 schrieb Brandon Armstead:
> Some interesting results indeed. If I place the same block of code with
> or without dlg_get first then dlg_bye AFTER loose_route -- kamailio ignores
> the packet.
>
> If I place it before loose_route WITH dlg_get FIRST - it works as expected.
What do you mean by "kamailio ignores the packet"? Is this equivalent to what
you described initially regarding dialogs that were terminated single-sided
only?
Cheers,
--Timo
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Timo Reimann <s...@foo-lounge.de> wrote:
> Hey Brandon,
>
>
> Am 02.11.2011 um 00:32 schrieb Brandon Armstead:
> > Thats correct - however I am calling this before loose_route, perhaps
> > that is my problem and need for calling dlg_get? Let me give this a go -
> > and I will respond back with my findings, thanks!
>
> Yeah, that should be it -- linking to the currently active dialog is being
> implemented as a callback to record-routed messages which takes place after a
> call to loose_route().
>
> Looking forward to hearing your findings. :)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Timo
>
>
>
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Timo Reimann <s...@foo-lounge.de> wrote:
> > Hey Brandon,
> >
> >
> > Am 01.11.2011 um 23:44 schrieb Brandon Armstead:
> > > Thank you for the input - I actually just figured out a resolution.
> > >
> > > Apparently dlg_bye("all") must be called after dlg_get - so what I'm
> > > doing now is simply checking for request with a special request uri with
> > > the callid / from tag / to tag in the request that correlates to the call
> > > I desire to terminate. I am then feeding $ci, $tt, and $ft into dlg_get
> > > and then calling dlg_bye("all") - in which Kamailio then proceeds to send
> > > BYE out to both legs of the call.
> > >
> > > I think we can mark this as resolved :).
> >
> > OK, very good. :)
> >
> > Let me make sure that this isn't a dialog module bug: You are now calling
> > dlg_get() followed by dlg_bye() with proper parameters from within the
> > Kamailio configuration script? if so, you shouldn't need to call dlg_get()
> > in the first place, at least not if you place dlg_bye() after the call to
> > loose_route(). Contrary, using certain dialog features (including
> > dlg_bye()) from reply routes isn't completely possible yet which could
> > explain your findings.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --Timo
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Timo Reimann <s...@foo-lounge.de> wrote:
> > > Hey Brandon,
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 01.11.2011 um 22:48 schrieb Brandon Armstead:
> > > > I am attempting to tear down a call with a BYE packet generated
> > > > externally (kind of similar to Kamailio fifo dlg_end_dlg).
> > > >
> > > > Let me describe what I am trying to do in more depth and then I will
> > > > continue to tell you the problem I think I am experiencing.
> > > >
> > > > [PSTN SIP Proxy] -> [CORE SIP Proxy] -> [REGISTRAR] -> [UAC]
> > > >
> > > > So the above layout is the normal call flow / structure of calls
> > > > (incoming when originating from pstn) (outgoing when originating from
> > > > uac).
> > > >
> > > > I then have an "external" host - I am attempting to generate a BYE to
> > > > [CORE SIP Proxy] and have it go both directions [PSTN] + [UAC].
> > > >
> > > > So far I am able to get the call to tear down in only a single
> > > > direction (only kill call with PSTN) or (only kill call with UAC).
> > > >
> > > > I have not been able to kill both legs of the call.
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > >
> > > > My Question - what am I doing wrong - or what is the best method to
> > > > tackle this task?
> > >
> > > If I get you right you are trying to emulate Kamailio's dlg_end_dlg
> > > functionality without involving Kamailio at all (except for passing
> > > forward the BYE requests). This makes your question sort of off-topic as
> > > processing BYE requests is a matter of RFC 3261 alone.
> > >
> > > Apart from that, what you could do is take a look at the dialog module
> > > code and check how it implements dlg_end_dlg. An idea I have what you
> > > could possibly be doing wrong is not using the CSeq numbers that each
> > > party expects. I don't have the details at hand but if either CSeq number
> > > is off your UAs won't accept the BYE request.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > --Timo
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
