Hi Henning, Thank you very much for your reply. I'll check it. Best Regards, Laura
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Henning Westerholt < henning.westerh...@1und1.de> wrote: > On Thursday 30 June 2011, laura testi wrote: > > [...] > > pres_refresh_watchers triggered by xcap message in another presence > server: > > with the hashing over to uri in dispacther workaround, it seems solve the > > first problem for SIP/SIMPLE messages, but we have the same kind of > > problem for xcap message. For example, a subscription is in a local cache > > of one server, and the incomming xcap message related to the same > > subscription goes to another server, and this message trigger the > > pres_update_watchers pres_refresh_watchers presence functions from the > > configuration script in the server where there is no subscription in the > > local cache, then it send the wrong notify message. This can happen when > a > > user add/remove a contact, and the SUBSCRIBE goes to one server and XCAP > > PUT goes to another server. Unfortunately there is no DB mode only in > > PRESENCE module like REGISTRAR module. The fallback to db can't help > > either for point 1 or for point 2. Can you help please? > > Hi laura, > > i can't comment on the other question, but Marius B did some presence > extensions in master branch a few month ago, that the presence module now > supports a db_mode module parameter including DB_ONLY. It will be in > kamailio > 3.2, maybe you can have a look to the master branch and backport it, if you > need it faster. > > Best regards, > > Henning >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users