Hello,
I tested with kamailio default config and injected some REGISTERs to
reproduce the scenario, see the SIP trace below. The results were ok in
200 reply, also in kamctl.
Can you send me also a SIP trace for the situation? Also, the parameters
for registrar and usrloc modules. Do you you have a particular
matching_mode set?
Thanks,
Daniel
U 2011/06/03 09:39:05.409702 127.0.0.1:56741 -> 127.0.0.1:5060
REGISTER sip:127.0.0.1:5060 SIP/2.0
From: "Test" <sip:test@127.0.0.1>;tag=as23
To: "Test" <sip:test@127.0.0.1>
Call-ID: aa@127.0.0.1
User-Agent: snom100_1.9b
CSeq: 2 REGISTER
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5080
Contact: <sip:me@127.0.0.1:2001;ob>
Expires: 900
Content-Length: 0
U 2011/06/03 09:39:05.413813 127.0.0.1:5060 -> 127.0.0.1:5080
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
From: "Test" <sip:test@127.0.0.1>;tag=as23
To: "Test" <sip:test@127.0.0.1>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.521d
Call-ID: aa@127.0.0.1
CSeq: 2 REGISTER
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5080.
Contact: <sip:me@127.0.0.1:2001;ob>;expires=900.
Server: kamailio (3.2.0-dev5 (x86_64/darwin)).
Content-Length: 0.
.
U 2011/06/03 09:39:43.616036 127.0.0.1:56948 -> 127.0.0.1:5060
REGISTER sip:127.0.0.1:5060 SIP/2.0
From: "Test" <sip:test@127.0.0.1>;tag=as23
To: "Test" <sip:test@127.0.0.1>
Call-ID: aa@127.0.0.1
User-Agent: snom100_1.9b
CSeq: 3 REGISTER
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5080
Contact: <sip:me@127.0.0.1:3001;transport=UDP;ob>
Contact: <sip:me@127.0.0.1:2001;ob>;expires=0
Expires: 900
Content-Length: 0
U 2011/06/03 09:39:43.618327 127.0.0.1:5060 -> 127.0.0.1:5080
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
From: "Test" <sip:test@127.0.0.1>;tag=as23
To: "Test" <sip:test@127.0.0.1>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.521d
Call-ID: aa@127.0.0.1
CSeq: 3 REGISTER
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5080.
Contact: <sip:me@127.0.0.1:3001;transport=UDP;ob>;expires=900.
Server: kamailio (3.2.0-dev5 (x86_64/darwin)).
Content-Length: 0.
.
# kamctl ul show
Domain:: location table=512 records=1 max_slot=1
AOR:: test
Contact:: sip:me@127.0.0.1:3001;transport=UDP;ob Q=
Expires:: 889
Callid:: aa@127.0.0.1
Cseq:: 3
User-agent:: snom100_1.9b
State:: CS_NEW
Flags:: 0
Cflag:: 0
Socket:: udp:127.0.0.1:5060
Methods:: 4294967295
# kamctl ul show
Domain:: location table=512 records=1 max_slot=1
AOR:: test
Contact:: sip:me@127.0.0.1:3001;transport=UDP;ob Q=
Expires:: 690
Callid:: aa@127.0.0.1
Cseq:: 3
User-agent:: snom100_1.9b
State:: CS_NEW
Flags:: 0
Cflag:: 0
Socket:: udp:127.0.0.1:5060
Methods:: 4294967295
On 6/3/11 12:16 AM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi,
On 06/03/2011 12:10 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
one more thing, what is the output of kamctl ul show? I want to see if
it is a matter of building the contact header for reply or is in
internal list of location records.
Domain:: location table=512 records=1 max_slot=1
AOR:: m...@somedomain.com
Contact:: sip:me@10.0.0.7:52030;ob Q=
Expires:: 875
Callid:: DZZHTDttFd5WivydjNnWfpRLsXp8RIYh
Cseq:: 4599
User-agent:: myclient
Received:: sip:1.2.3.4:55642
Path::<sip:lb@127.0.0.1:5060;lr;received=sip:1.2.3.4:55642>
State:: CS_SYNC
Flags:: 0
Cflag:: 192
Socket:: udp:127.0.0.1:5062
Methods:: 8143
Contact:: sip:me@1.2.3.4:55642;transport=UDP;ob Q=
Expires:: 876
Callid:: DZZHTDttFd5WivydjNnWfpRLsXp8RIYh
Cseq:: 4601
User-agent:: myclient
Path::<sip:lb@127.0.0.1:5060;lr>
State:: CS_SYNC
Flags:: 0
Cflag:: 0
Socket:: udp:127.0.0.1:5062
Methods:: 8143
Hope this helps,
Andreas
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
