> 
> 
> 
>> I can theoretically see a need for it both in NAT situations and IPv6.
> 
>> Diversion is deprecated.
> 
> No, it became RFC 5806 past year:
> 
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5806
Category: HIstoric

Because it took so much time between the Diversion draft and the SIP-history 
RFC, everyone implemented Diversion headers. The IETF felt that this had to be 
documented, but not on standard trac and not as any sort of recommendation. 
Result: It's still deprecated.

Not all RFCs are standard trac. The IAX2 and ZRTP are just informational RFCs 
even though some people claim that these protocols are now "IETF standard" 
since they have RFC numbers... Well, they're not. We could propably write an 
RFC about Kamailio's MI interface or the RTPproxy management protocol and 
publish, but they won't be on standard track...

/O
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to