Hi All . Any other suggestion for this ?
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Sameer Khan <sameer2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks Great Jeremy, > > I will see if there is of any help for me and let u know. > > Thanks for sharing > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Jeremy McNamara <j...@indie.org> wrote: > >> On 3/17/11 6:23 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: >> >>> In some cases, it can be, depending on what you're doing with Asterisk to >>> begin with. Pure call routing without any of the interactivity that >>> Asterisk introduces is a valid application for a solitary Kamailio setup. >>> But you're right, many real-world call transit applications can't get by on >>> Kamailio alone. >>> >>> >> >> It is possible to only setup Kamailio to do far end nat-traversal without >> proxying RTP. So, depending on the 'world' in question a B2BUA / Asterisk >> might not be absolutely required. >> >> >> I have a simple configuration on my blog: http://bit.ly/f8X9SN >> >> >> Comments and/or improvements are absolutely welcome! >> >> >> >> Jeremy McNamara >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
