El Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:15:27 +0100 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> escribió:
> This should not be that complex, there is no function name that has '.' > in order to have current conflicts to solve. My concern is related to > modules with very long names, but seems that most of such cases do not > export lot of functions (e.g., presence_*). > > Alternative is to introduce a short id for modules, eg,: > > ps => presence > rp => rtpproxy Both of them could be used. One short version for expert people and the long, full format for newbies or in didactical examples. I think this module.function syntax is a good idea. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
