On Nov 02, 2010 at 18:42, Henning Westerholt <henning.westerh...@1und1.de> wrote: > On Sunday 24 October 2010, Juha Heinanen wrote: > > [..] > > yes, i just had forgotten to call force_send_socket() in one particular > > case and therefore got the send errors. > > > > i have not used mhomed=1 because of the performance warning on the wiki > > page. it that warning still valid? > > Hello Marius, > > you did some tests in the past after your improvement(s). Do you think the > performance warning is still valid? Otherwise we should remove it.
While the performance improved a lot (fewer syscalls), it's still slower then no mhomed (it still does 2 extra syscalls per send), so I would leave the warning. We could improve it further, either caching already tried destinations, or getting a copy of the routing table and using it directly (w/o having to do syscalls any more). However I don't think anybody complained loudly about it so far (even with mhomed on it still can do thousands of calls per seconds), so it is quite low priority. Andrei _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
