Hello,
On 10/25/10 6:25 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, I know that handling bflags outside of branch_route is not a good
idea. Anyhow I have a doubt:
1) In a normal route I set "setbflag(i:1)"
why are you using "i:1"? The parameter must be just 1.
, so the bflag will be set
for all the branches that could be generated for this incoming
transaction. This also involves creating new branches manually under
failure_route, am I right?
Note: I do know that it would be much better just to use flag instead of bflags.
2) The outgoing transaction(s) fail so I enter into failure_route. If
I inspect here bflag(i:1) will it be set or not? I remember that it
will be set.
3) Then I call append_branch in failure_route, or perhaps call
loockup("location") and I expect that all the generated branches will
have the bflag set, am I right?
never used in this way, but the normal usage is per branch and when you
do it in the main route then it is just for first branch.
Cheers,
Daniel
Thanks a lot.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
