Is Record-Route: a,b,c analog of
Record-Route: a Record-Route: b Record-Route: c or Record-Route: c Record-Route: b Record-Route: a ? On Thursday 14 October 2010, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Morten Isaksen writes: > > When OpenSer sends the message to Kamailio the recourd-routes look like > > this: > > > > Record-Route: <sip:x.x.248.20;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b> > > Record-Route: <sip:x.x.248.20;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b> > > > > But when the message comes back from Kamailio it is: > > Record-Route: > > <sip:x.x.248.7;lr=on;ftag=3d9e7d131b;did=584.1a683a45>,<sip:x.x.248.20;r2 > >=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b>,<sip:x.x.248.20;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d > >131b> > > > > OpenSER forwards the message to the OCS with Record-route unchanged > > and the OCS gets confused and does not reply. > > then file a bug to ocs folks, because ocs should understand r-r header > that contains more than one entry. > > -- juha > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
