Hello,

We had been experiencing memory leaks issues with our Kamailio deployment. Some 
of the process started to use all their assigned memory and arises allocation 
memory errors. Using the "kill -SIGUSR1" as explained in the Kamailio wiki and 
found the problem:

 

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: <core> [main.c:788]: 
INFO: signal 15 received

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: <core> [main.c:799]: 
Memory status (pkg):

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status: (0x885a60):

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status: heap size= 
67108864

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status: used= 
60641440, used+overhead=67096424, free=12440

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status: max used 
(+overhead)= 67102896

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status: dumping all 
alloc'ed. fragments:

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:      0. N  
address=0x8baf78 frag=0x8baf48 size=16 used=1

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:           
alloc'd from <core>: rvalue.c: mk_rval_expr_v(2452)

Sep  8 11:34:04 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:          
start check=f0f0f0f0, end check= c0c0c0c0, abcdefed

...

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:    1618. N  
address=0x95e920 frag=0x95e8f0 size=936 used=1

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:           
alloc'd from <core>: rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(233)

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:          
start check=f0f0f0f0, end check= c0c0c0c0, abcdefed

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:    1633. N  
address=0x95f528 frag=0x95f4f8 size=936 used=1

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:           
alloc'd from <core>: rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(233)

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:          
start check=f0f0f0f0, end check= c0c0c0c0, abcdefed

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:    1634. N  
address=0x95f930 frag=0x95f900 size=936 used=1

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:           
alloc'd from <core>: rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(233)

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:          
start check=f0f0f0f0, end check= c0c0c0c0, abcdefed

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:    1696. N  
address=0x962298 frag=0x962268 size=944 used=1

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:           
alloc'd from <core>: rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(233)

Sep  8 11:34:06 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:          
start check=f0f0f0f0, end check= c0c0c0c0, abcdefed

.

. (the rvalue.c repeats all the time)

.

 

Sep  8 11:34:23 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:    64963. N  
address=0x4885118 frag=0x48850e8 size=944 used=1

Sep  8 11:34:23 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:           
alloc'd from <core>: rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(233)

Sep  8 11:34:23 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:          
start check=f0f0f0f0, end check= c0c0c0c0, abcdefed

Sep  8 11:34:23 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:    64964. N  
address=0x4885528 frag=0x48854f8 size=1288 used=1

Sep  8 11:34:23 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:           
alloc'd from <core>: rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(233)

Sep  8 11:34:23 localhost /sbin/kamailio[17275]: INFO: qm_status:          
start check=f0f0f0f0, end check= c0c0c0c0, abcdefed

 

 

We saw there was several core memory leaks resolved in the 3.0.3 version (we 
had the 3.0.2), so we decided to upgrade to that version. Now I was trying to 
check the memory status of the process (in order to see if the problem is 
arising again) with "kill -SIGUSR1" but now only show the memory status of the 
shm and the memory of the attendant process (the one who launch the other 
ones). I had tried to send the signal to each of the son process but I see 
nothing in the log.

Is this a new bug or is that there is other new way to see the memory status of 
the processes? 

 

Thanks in advance,

 

 http://www.alhambra-eidos.es/CO/1.gif<http://www.alhambra-eidos.es/CO/1.gif> 

César Pinto. ICM Team +34 91 787 23 00

http://www.alhambra-eidos.es/CO/3.gif <http://www.alhambra-eidos.es/> 

 

 

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to