On 8/26/10 4:47 PM, Geoffrey Mina wrote:
OK, so In my scenario this wouldn't achieve what I am looking for.  I
basically want 2 servers to get all the round-robin requests unless
they are unavailable. Then I would want the lower proiority servers
brought into the mix.

Maybe ill take a look at the source to see how tough this would be.

you can do that. It is up to your logic in config -- use as may setids as you need in cascade. E.g., just build the logic so that if all routes in dispatcher setid X fails then use routes from setid Y.

Cheers,
Daniel

Thanks.

On 8/26/10, Geoffrey Mina<geoffreym...@gmail.com>  wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about the "priority" in the dispatcher module.  I looked
in the docu-wiki and there was nothing which actually described how this
field is used (exactly), so I can only guess or ask the list.

Say I have 3 destinations in a set:

set: 1
dest: sip:1.2.3.4:5060
priority: 1

set: 1
dest: sip:1.2.3.5:5060
priority: 1

set: 1
dest: sip:1.2.3.6:5060
priority: 0


I am using ds_select_domain("1","4") to retrieve my list of destinations.

In this scenario, would the calls only route to 1.2.3.6 if .4 and .5 were
both out of service?

Thanks.


--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to