Hi
How can I move force_send_socket() call into branch_route? Could
someone give me an example, please.
Thank you
Ernest
I have this script:
########################################################################
# Failure route 'pstn-failover'
########################################################################
failure_route[1]
{
xlog("L_INFO", "Failure route for PSTN entered - M=$rm RURI=$ru
F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
route(16);
if(!next_gw())
{
xlog("L_ERR", "Failed to select next PSTN gateway - M=$rm
RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
route(5);
exit;
}
t_on_failure("1");
switch($rd)
{
case "10.10.10.2":
force_send_socket(udp:10.10.10.1:5060);
case "10.10.10.4":
force_send_socket(udp:10.10.10.3:5060);
case "10.10.10.6":
force_send_socket(udp:10.10.10.5:5060);
case "10.10.10.8":
force_send_socket(udp:10.10.10.7:5060);
break;
}
route(7);
}
On 29. 06. 2010 13:44, Geoffrey Mina wrote:
Yeah, Juha's suggestion worked perfectly. As soon as I
moved the force_send_socket() call into branch_route everything started
working.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Klaus
Darilion <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at>
wrote:
IIRC
force_send_socket operates on "branch[0]". Now it depends how the the
new branch is added, e.g. if send--socket properties are copied into
new branch or not. IRRC there were some changes either in 1.5 or 3.0.
You can also access a branch's aprameter directly:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/pseudo-variables/devel#branch_attributes
or try Juha's suggestion with branch_route
regards
klaus
Am 28.06.2010 19:08, schrieb Geoffrey Mina:
I am having an issue with 1.5.4 where
force_send_socket() isn't behaving
as I would expect.
I have an LCR scenario where depending on which gateway I am sending to,
I send from a different socket.
It appears that calling force_send_socket from failure_route has no
affect on the routing. In my initial route block I call
force_send_socket(X.X.X.180:5060). In my failure_route I am calling
force_send_socket(X.X.X.179:5060), yet after calling the subsequent
time, my sip trace and tcpdump are clearly showing kamailio is still
sending from X.X.X.180:5060.
I have added a lot of debug lines, so I am 100% sure the second call to
force_send_socket is happening.
Am I misusing this module in some way?
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Ernest Mavrel
technical support
Novatel d.o.o.
informacijske tehnologije
Mariborska 88, SI - 3000 Celje
tel: +386 (0)82 800 823
fax: +386 (0)82 800 821
mobile: +386 (0)51 436 453
e-mail: ernest.mav...@novatel.si
|
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
