On Jun 14, 2010 at 15:19, Henning Westerholt <henning.westerh...@1und1.de> wrote: > On Monday 14 June 2010, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: > > > Indeed the ser auth module is superiour in this areas to the kamailio > > > one. I can't judge about the auth_radius side, as i did not used it so > > > far. > > > > I have no idea about the radius part either (Juha knows better). The > > problem is that right now if one wants to use auth from module_s and > > radius, he/she can't and the quickest way to fix it is to temporarily > > revive the modules_s/*radius stuff (which will have the unpleasant > > side-effect of some path changes: modules/auth_radius => > > modules_k/auth_radius and modules/misc_radius => modules_k/misc_radius). > > Hi Andrei, > > so if i understand correctly the main problem is the name space colision in > the auth api? What about renaming the auth API binding function, as you > suggested in another mail and extending the docs a bit? Then at least it > should work with auth from k, and we don't need to change the paths for this > modules.
There is still the problem of specifying the path in the cfg. If one has loadpath "modules:modules_s", and laodmodule "auth_radius" => modules/auth_radius is loaded => problems. OTOH if modules/auth_radius is moved back to modules_k/auth_radius => no problem for default cfgs for both ser and kamailio. Andrei _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users