2010/4/30 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at>: > 200 OK seems correct as long as the transaction is still in memory. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-9.2
I don't agree. As per RFC 3261 when a proxy receives a 200 for an INVITE the transaction is terminated so a CANCEL after the 200 should not match such transaction. Then the proxy should reply 481 to the CANCEL rather than a 200. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
