Stefan Sayer writes: > > perhaps it would be possible in the same way detach rtp component from > > sems b2bua signaling component. perhaps it even would be possible to > > but, is that desirable? isn't it better if one has only one process to > start/configure/watch?
may it does not matter how load balancing/resilience is achieved, i.e., by sip router selecting a combined b2bua+relay or a b2bua selecting a relay. > also, I think that implementing the mediaproxy relay part control in > SEMS is more work than impelementing RTP packet forward (actually, in > RTP receiver, it only needs to check whether relay is turned on for > that session, construct an RTP packet from the buffer, and send the > packet there). fine with me as long as relaying is done in kernel space (libnetfilter-conntrack) close to wire speed. -- juha _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
