On 4/9/10 9:11 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 09.04.2010 20:29, schrieb Juha Heinanen:
Vikram Ragukumar writes:
> Why is the SDP connection parameter not being rewritten for the 180
> Ringing message alone ?
are you sure that you are calling a function, such as use_media_proxy()
or corresponding rtpproxy function, on the ringing reply? does both
ringing and session progress contain a sdp body?
> How can i ensure the SIP messages are relayed in the order they are
> received ?
someone who is familiar with tm/core needs to reply to this one. there
may not be any guarantee, because the replies are processed by different
processes.
I think the only solution would be to use single processes:
children=1, tcp_children=1.
This is right. However, this is not only related to sip server itself,
the messages can arrive in a different order when using UDP because of
network. Handling it in server is not a complete solution. The phones
should be able to deal with such cases.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla * http://www.asipto.com/ *
http://twitter.com/miconda *
http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
