henningw left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4539)
Thanks for the additional comments @zenichev, it sounds resonable to me,
understand the motivation. But I think that we probably should migrate the
module completely to the new approach, and not having a mix of new (trusted)
and old (address) data structures logic. About the duplicate entries, if they
are not needed from a functional point of view, we don't need to keep this
capability IMHO.
As a side note, the permission module is probably a bit of a special case, as
its data its much more volatile as e.g. LCR or carrierroute. The carrierroute
module uses a simple approach with access locking and swapping the old and new
data structures. But as there are no concurrent reloads done, this is of course
fine.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4539#issuecomment-3737868238
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4539/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
