miconda left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4494)
> > This report is inconsistent and imprecise, at the first sight does not look
> > like a human did a minimal proof check -- there is no `struct pv_spec` in
> > Kamailio code, so the `struct replace_with` cannot not have a field of such
> > type.
>
> It looks like a spelling mistake, the correct name is _pv_spec_t_ and it is
> indeed part of _replace_with_ struct.
Not easy to believe is a spelling error, there is no `struct` prefix for that
field inside `replace_with`, but more like an AI-generated report.
Anyhow, since the field is `pv_spec_t)`, then it should be no crash because of:
```
memset(e, 0, sizeof(pv_spec_t));
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4494#issuecomment-3580507843
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4494/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
