henningw left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4336)
> > If it's NOT a URN scheme, then '@' is an invalid charachter in host part
> > and should error out.
> > If it is a URN scheme, '@' is just another character in the host name and
> > it's valid.
>
> I haven't looked at the code, but from your comments above I guess that the
> URN value is stored in the host field of the URI structure? Would it be a
> case where the part after the `@` should be actually used as a host/domain
> (ie., the urn with the role of the username, and the value after `@` as
> domain/ip address)?
I don't work daily with URNs, but I think according to their definition there
is no concept of a host name in it. Its basically a character for the purposes
of the URN. There are other standards which are using URNs (e.g. Canonical
Text Services) which uses it or adressing of sub-elements inside a specific
content. The parser is taking some shortcuts, it would be probably better if it
would be separate from the URI/URL part. Its also probably does not fully
support the mentioned RFC.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4336#issuecomment-3108917063
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4336/c3108917...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
